Dominated by Sophie
1
Homosexuality is a byproduct, not a causal origin. It doesn’t generate itself and is a consequence of phenomena outside itself. This holds true whether looking at humans or animals like cicadas or lions. In the former, homosexuality results from being infested by a fungus seeking to promote its own transmission; in the latter, it stems from being denied access to sexual partners.
Those who despise our kind view homosexuality as an acausal manifestation of will, existing somehow beyond the scope of biological determinism or choice. This tangentially relates to the problem of the Ego™, as understood by the average person, but as a result, they perceive homosexuality as something almost arbitrarily identified, and once identified, it irreversibly contextualizes a person’s mode of being within the scope of “being gay.” All their experiences become recontextualized through this lens.
Fortunately, homosexuality is observed in Western civilization with excessive consistency and predictability in one context: the dynamic that fuels its causal factors — google prison rape phenomena. Circumstantial incels with no barriers to excessive violence, due to prolonged deprivation of access to the opposite sex (much like male lions engaging in homosexuality), will violently impose themselves on another man who lacks the capacity or will to resist the aggression¹.
In this scenario, the victim’s entire lived world is rapidly recontextualized and redefined. They must choose between suffering in compliance or futile resistance. In either case, the man is forced into a more feminine role (solely due to submission, not a “natural” expression of femininity).
This is frequently reported in historical cases of socialized homosexuality, grooming gangs (e.g., in Weimar), etc. It also seems plausible that homosexual tastes can be trained through initiation and habit (abstinence seems effective in eliminating it, like most fetishes).
2
Homosexuality is found in over 450 species. Homophobia is found in only one. Which seems unnatural now?
Rape is found in over 450 species. Consent is found in only one. Which seems unnatural now?
Think about it.
3
Ironic homosexuality makes you gay. LARPing as anything will just turn it into a meme—your subconscious doesn’t read the nuances of irony. That’s the premise of PUA as a self-help tool: fake it ‘til you make it.
BAP only glorifies the male body; he doesn’t practice ironic homosexuality. Puritans just see in it a reflection of their deepest anxieties, especially Christians.
4
Femboys are a distinct category from traps. Femboys are simply feminine, playing with feminine aesthetics, but traps actively try to pass as girls, like transsexuals, without dysphoria. They’re different things.
5
Fetishes are clear examples of recursively produced “desire complexes” from compulsive pornography consumption, prohibiting natural sexual pleasure. Any fetish (including homosexuality) can be cured through prolonged abstinence. Nofappers call it a porn reboot; Daoists call it Virgin Boy Training.
6
I often wonder why homosexuals never radicalized—not the castrated, astroturfed LGBT Obamunist version, but the underground gay culture—by admitting its roots in childhood sexual abuse instead of denying they’re all complicit, embracing it.
The desire for reproduction is natural. I pity modern, weak, castrated homosexuals who can’t abandon their degrading fetishism nor fully commit to it. Where are the proudly armed child-rape gay gangs of old?
It’s time they weaponize their only method of propagation. The hypermasculine fuel of biker gangs will add color to the collapse, if nothing else. Militant grooming squads. Pozzing warriors. Maybe they’ve been too subculturally genocided or at least too demoralized…
7
Despite being 3% of the population, they account for over 40% of molestations.
How do you explain the overrepresentation of childhood abuse among homosexuals?
There’s ample evidence showing the extreme overrepresentation of homosexuality among pedophile abusers, the prevalence of pederasty in the homosexual community, and the significant correlation between childhood sexual abuse and adult homosexuality.
8
I believe the reason so many incels are transitioning has more to do with the intense rate of online sexual abuse targeting zoomers, coupled with domestic emotional abuse from single mothers. This created a generation of abused boys with similar traits, identity issues, isolation, depression, and even identity dysphoria (common in abuse victims). Chud and Trap are just two distinct paths from the same branch.
Transitioning from testosterone to estrogen creates an ego shift and dissociation between the original and “new” identity; for those with traumatic lives, this is extremely therapeutic. I believe this is why many benefit greatly from transitioning, especially transgenders I’ve met from highly abusive homes who didn’t even seem “trans.” Assuming a new persona by obliterating the old Ego is the best therapy we know.
Plus, it keeps these betas out of the gene pool, which is highly beneficial. However, it’s preferable that good men don’t castrate themselves or take harmful female hormones, but if it’s inevitable, we must reconcile somehow. Right-wing Twitter and trans Twitter need to unite for the good of both.
Also, for all the traps out there, here’s a secret, esoteric tip that Twitter chasers don’t want you to know:
A ton of girls like feminine guys! If you’re really cute and became a trap because you’re a failed incel and now only date other traps or failed incels, don’t worry! Get a (cis) girlfriend!
Who knows, maybe you’ll detransition and abandon this whole trans thing, maybe find God? Or not, but it’s worth being optimistic, right? You don’t want to live your whole life like this, do you? Dead, childless, by your own hand.
Transitioning incels never bonded with their mothers at a young age, were neglected, left alone in daycare or with nannies. A lifelong Oedipus complex. A pathological desire to be young, small, pretty. The real cure? A successful union with a virtuous woman, and the dysphoria will cease.
“But I had a successful union and I’m still trans!” No, you didn’t. You need unconditional love, the love of a mother, a lifelong best friend. Not a boyfriend or girlfriend.
The true cure is storge. Transgender? No. It’s astorganism. They’re not trans; they’re astorgic.
9
I wonder if, for many modern trans people, their trans identity is more a reaction to being extremely online during their formative years, wired to the core of their fragile egos. How many trans people do you know who aren’t internet addicts?
People will say, “NO, BUT HE’S A BOY,” but come on, with our culture, is that really surprising? What porn would they have seen at that age? They’d have seen big, muscular guys screwing small, hairless girls.
What prepubescent boy can actually insert himself as the big man? A kid doesn’t even have testosterone coursing through their body; they’re effectively girls. Either they become a cuck or identify with the girl. No middle ground.
For girls, this is likely why they become FtM too, but more because they see cute, shaved, barely legal teen boys and can identify even with their sexual organs, which probably scares them since fear of rape is a natural female instinct.
It wouldn’t surprise me if a girl more worried about being raped as a child ended up more masculine—it seems obvious without any knowledge of child developmental psychology.
I don’t know, watching porn after puberty is probably fine comparatively. But I think prepubescent kids exposed to heavy porn have silently traumatized MANY kids in our generation and set their sexual reference frame for life in a completely warped way.
I almost wonder if it’s not something like orangutan flanging. Heavy porn exposure in prepuberty triggers something in our body, and you become effeminate. Sounds crazy, but it’s basically what happens with male orangutans. Much to consider.
This isn’t something people want to mention because, honestly, it’s gross to talk about, but for many of us Zoomers now in our 20s, with free internet in the early 2000s, that’s the reality, the basic reality for us. All of us.
Having your identity shaped online, reacting to that, and reacting to the primal issues it creates in your tangible real-world life probably causes an avalanche of dysphoria, gender-related or not, socialized online and marginalized in real life.
I wonder, though, if it’s not that they developed feminine personalities, because that act alone shows something, but that they have naturally androgynous personalities and don’t fit the “average boy.”
I think any kid who spends too much time online and not outdoors will be effeminate and androgynous, because without vitamin D, you don’t produce T, so they’ll likely bloom late and be more prone to gender-related dysphoria (or not—many of these people never experienced any form of dysphoria).
Okay, now that I’m done, I think this got longer than expected…
“MAKE NAMBLA LEGAL AGAIN” — SM
Part Two: Parable of Iron Prison
31
If you recognize pathology, brokenness, denatured life as what it is, it can teach you a lot about life in healthy state. There is nothing wrong with looking in life under distress, if you no confuse it for life in ascent and freedom. When you put some kind of working dog, like terrier, even cute Jack Russell in city apartment, they will start to try to dig through the floor. This mode is inborn to them, they seek the development of their powers, and there are very few sadder things than to see animal thwarted like this. Playing at becoming itself, but reduced to a doll and useless acting. Carl Schmitt said, “They’ve put us out to pasture.” This is the condition of life in modern world.
32
Modern world not bad just because modern; and it is better than some ages in the past. Many parts of past were as bad, or worse, than our situation, and for the same reasons. The modern is “nothing new”: it is the return of a very ancient subjection and brokenness under new branding, promoted by new concepts and justifications. If you want to see our future look to Europe as it existed before 1600 BC, or much of the world as it was until recently and still is….the communal life of the longhouse with its young men dominated and broken by the old and sclerotic, by the matriarchs, the blob and yeast mode in human life overtaking and subjecting all higher aspiration. Aztec “cities” with twenty morons sleeping and eating off the floor, demagogued in the masses by blood-hungry priests with dead eyes. It is no different if they use the doxies of Reason and Logos to cart us off to this life.
33
A history of modern brokenness—So many different things have been written about the evils of modernity, or the crisis of our situation. Both on left and right many, maybe most, feel something has gone terribly wrong. Even those who love some aspects of the new age, like technology, look away from our banal time and instead hope for a futuristic flourishing that is not yet here. I’m a little tired of all this! I don’t want to just repeat more aspersions of modernity, which many of you already know. Most of these are footnotes or commentaries to Nietzsche’s Prologue from Zarathustra, where he describes the Last Man. The Last Man has been wrongly confused for the bourgeois, though Nietzsche says it’s something much worse. Houellebecq, whose explanations of the sexual problem of modernity, of the incel —all of these explanations are amazing and true, but even he is just following Nietzsche. If you want to understand true problem of our time, you can read that, then, and I won’t dwell on it. I want only to deal with one particular case of domestication, brokenness, of potentially high life that has been thwarted, to illustrate modern problem. The peculiar “history” of how the queen develops, the modern effeminate homosexual, is very telling. The problem of the modern homosexual is revealing because it is the model according to which many other kinds of higher life have been thwarted and warped into something else. Don’t be fooled by propagandists: the modern homo has nothing to do with ancient “predatory bisexuality” or with the pederastic rites found in many societies. On one hand such people as the modern queen have always existed but on the other, there are many specimens now who become this, who would not have before. It is very unfortunate event in life of animal. Camille Paglia says that the modern homosexual is the product of the pressures of post-industrial life. Her model for this is that a very sensitive young boy, open to aesthetic experience of all kinds, maybe the kind of slightly neurotic and artistic boy that a century ago would have experienced synaesthesia; such boy is turned off by the horseplay and “rough” masculinity of his brothers and father and other boys his age. The distancing from this masculinity is concurrent with his becoming over-close with his mother, idolizing the feminine: upon puberty, the distance or fear from masculinity leads him to eroticize it, while he turns away from women, either because of too much familiarity, or too much awe. In this she is only half right, and the other half of the story I discovered from an alien mind whose teachings have been spread among some of the frogs. His name Harro MJ, but I think this is false name. I tell some of his ideas here as best I understood. He tells I believe his own story, or someone he knows: he tells of how modern world corrupted his nature through stricture and turned him into a homo. But I think his story speaks to many others, who didn’t turn into ghey, but who have nevertheless been disfigured in some other way… by the same force. Now, Paglia’s restatement of Freud is correct, but she misses an important element of the story, which is why such a boy turns away from the masculinity of his peers in the first place. It is not horseplay or the roughness of male competition as such that makes him turn away, but the utterly fake or artificial character of such displays, usually, in our time. Such boy perceives what his peers don’t, the conditional and entirely dependent character of life in our age. It is not the masculinity, the competition for status among men, the physical roughness, that makes him turn away… but the fact that all such play is happening in already owned space. It is this aspect of our time that is crucial to understand. When I speak of something like owned space, it must not remain mere word. When you understand something: I mean you must see and feel it like you would a landscape you know from youth, how to navigate all its nooks, the different heights of earth, the banks of streams, where the trees are and how it feels inside them, how long it takes walking from this or that group of beech to the abandoned factory, so that the map is already in your body. This is only way to really understand something. I believe boy like this is one of the types that sees through the charade the lords of lies have dangled in front, the shadow-play to dazzle the many, and he is turned off, maybe not by manliness, but the buffoonish, deluded character of modern masculinity. The defeated male that is turned into a peon and a neutered beast for women and hidden masters is a terrible thing to see. The jockeying for status, the physical fights, the adventures boys are supposed to have in a state of nature…all of this is in nature meant as preparation for life, for a life of conquest and expansion. Roman teenagers of patrician class were sent already on missions on behalf of Empire abroad. Modern adult Western male seeks permission to watch other men playing sports, quaff vegetable oil relish, beg for “coochie” in simulated intercourse, masturbation with plastic on dick. Precisely a character born for conquest, for expansion, a precocious type of boy who seeks real development and the real domination of the space around him, who understands in his blood that play and manliness are to this end, precisely such a boy will have his expectations about life crushed and thwarted as soon as his eyes open. This may be around the age of six or seven, but it sometimes happens earlier. Such boy then comes to have only contempt for those among his peers who, not seeing the subjection we are in, continue under their delusion and accept the breaking that the lords of shadows begin on the human spirit around this age of awakening—by nine or ten, the “education” is almost already complete in our time. They submit to the yoke and their sham simulated masculinity is now a parody of the true manliness, which in a state of ascent develops into the will to actually dominate space around oneself, not into a caricature for the benefit of women. But this domination is not possible when space is already owned. This intuition of owned space comes on one very early: with eyes open, it’s like an evil spirit inhabits everything. I think there are many types of energetic and perceiving boys who reach this stage, who are turned off by the moral and biological self-castration of their conventional peers, who sense the suffocating limitations of modern space. The rest of this story is more particular to the boy who as response becomes a homo or trap, and Paglia is right about that part—masculinity rejected simply because of distance from other boys in general, mostly as a result of a certain native over-sensitivity. But then there is the added observation that when, late in adolescence or some time in youth, such boy decides he is “gay,” that is but the final act of self-misunderstanding. The drama of his spirit is reinterpreted on sexual terms. He has convinced himself that the feeling of suppression and dread that had accompanied him his whole life was because his sexual desires or “sexuality” had been repressed by “society.” He forgets how these sexual desires developed in the first place, that these desires themselves were a circuitous result of the truth that dawned on him in silence, the truth of the utter subjection and domestication of the space in which he found himself. In becoming “gay” he believes he is escaping that sense of primal limitation and subjection that he felt as a small boy: he has reinterpreted his entire drama as a maudlin story of sexuality suppressed or oppressed by retrograde social and political norms. In this he becomes an unwitting pawn himself of the very power that as a young boy he had intuited to be the enemy, the great and suffocating shadow of our time, that smothers all higher life out. The gay is the spiritual foot-soldier of the new regime, when he is born to be its enemy. This is the unusual part of this realization, that some of the most sensitive and perceptive youths, those maybe imbued with spark of inspiration and a conquering, expanding spirit, end up becoming the vanguard of that which has smothered and broken them. In a previous age they wouldn’t have been gay at all in the first place. The story of such boy is story of all higher types in our time. Not all gays are of this origin—there is Jeffrey Dahmer, there are others. And of course not all higher types become gay, only a tiny minority. But all higher types in our age are afflicted by a similar drama of the spirit—what happens later, the sexualization of this alienation particular to this case, I use only as the most vivid example. Now in all this you see this idea of space or territory that is already closed and owned. And this brings up the question of who or what this force is. I think the answer to this problem isn’t so simple, but one feature of this new condition in modern age is that the masters are hidden. That is even why this condition of subjection seems so suffocating, because they hide, and so there is no opportunity for open and manly challenge. This problem is then to be understood through example of a different type…and I mean that of the spook. Vivid and instructive is the matter of the gay underworld, which no longer really exists in our time. But in the 1950’s and a little before then, when the system of global tyranny was being firmly erected, it should not be a surprise from everything that has been said, that the gay underworld was the “negative” of the new world order, its sieve and pressure valve. The gay underworld was part of “the remainder.” The phenomenon of “homosexuality” in the modern world reaches up to the most profound of political and social problem: it was always the ghost world, the underworld left over that the engineers of our time couldn’t manage or account for in the erection of the Leviathan This underworld included far more than the gays of that time, of course: that’s the point. But the gays formed a kind of “bulk population” that allowed an easy bridge between this world and ours. They made it far more permeable to others as well: if you had girlfriend, maybe artsy girlfriend, she had ghey friend; you could go with them to lounge of this half-world, and there would be there…maybe two social contacts removed…there would…one of them. But now that this world has disappeared, you have no easy way of even knowing where to start. Its boundaries were policed, its entry points were surveilled, but it always existed as a space of freedom outside the pervasiveness of domestication in post- industrial civilization. Let’s not forget, I repeat, that the “gay underworld” was hardly just the gays, but precisely that world penetrated by all types of deviants, perverts, whores, pimps, impresarios, night club owners, mafia, gangsters, spooks, intelligence services of all kinds—just see the Dark Ocean Society and you will understand. The Dark Ocean Society of Japan is the key to understanding all modern political and social organization because underneath the pervasiveness of the domestication and management of modern civilization, underneath its superficial orderliness, there remained the “floating world,” the free world as a still and dark ocean in which moved monsters, including the lords and crafters of this new civilization themselves. They still live in that world, not in ours. Our world is the house of subjection, they live in the estate of freedom and power. It is only that, with the relatively large number of gays that exist, this world was much larger than it is now, and more varied, its entry points more penetrable. The space of night that gays created for themselves, in which such types could at least feel they had new opportunity to expand and act, was nuked in the 1980’s with AIDS first of all, and then at the same time with the “gay rights” and “gay identity” movement, through which they came “into the open,” and became the worst and most merciless enforcers of the global slave state. But enough about them: you must understand! I use this as illustrative and true example of what happens to all higher types in our time. The vast majority don’t become gay, but the plight of the gay is the most simple and therefore instructive example of this. Anyone born with a will to conquest and expansion, any specimen born to courage and the expansion of boundaries, will feel thwarted now, will awaken at a young age to find themselves in a world pervaded by an evil and smothering shadow that seeks to blot out their spirit and break them. How one responds to this… that is different. And the responses are various. Look at litter of pups, of whatever species, some will be inquisitive, playful, seek to experiment, to push boundaries, to leave gaze of parents and the old, to conquer space; others will be far more docile and will lack curiosity. The only ones who survive the modern education “whole,” not to speak of the regime of modern medication, are precisely those in the litter who are born docile. And more to the point; who can look at the beaten-down males of today and think that a boy who inside him has the spark of conquering spirit won’t have anything but disgust for their clownish parody of masculinity! What matters here is which way the spirit turns, and if it can survive the obstacle course of domestication that modern life and the modern education imposes on the best. “Homosexuality” in our age, in any case, is unlike any behavior in the past: as a total phenomenon, it represents one of the characteristic ways that some of the most unusual specimens respond to domestication and are broken by it. Modern homosexuality is a form of vacuum behavior and stereotypy.